Dealing with inappropriate-, low-quality-, and other forms of challenging peer review, including hostile referees and inflammatory or confusing critiques: Prevention and treatment-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Dealing with inappropriate-, low-quality-, and other forms of challenging peer review, including hostile referees and inflammatory or confusing critiques: Prevention and treatment

Published:2020-09-16 Issue:3 Volume:28 Page:162-185
ISSN:0898-9621
Container-title:Accountability in Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Accountability in Research

Author:

Lanier William L.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA

Funder

departmental resources

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Education,General Medicine

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08989621.2020.1815010

Reference19 articles.

1. How to Review a Manuscript

2. Residents' Clinic Articles in the Age of Competency-Based Medical Education

3. Editorial position on publishing articles on human organ transplantation

4. Council of Science Editors (Author). 2014. Scientific Style and Format: The CSE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers. 8th ed. 825. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5. Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Trust in open publishing practices;F1000Research;2024-07-30

2. Applied linguistics journal editor perspectives: Research ethics and academic publishing;Research Methods in Applied Linguistics;2023-12

3. Peer review: Problematic or promising?;The Economic and Labour Relations Review;2023-06

4. Nonfinancial conflict of interest in peer-review: Some notes for discussion;Accountability in Research;2021-10-10

5. Peer review experiences of academic chemists in Ph.D. granting institutions in the United States;Accountability in Research;2021-08-31