The reliability and validity of expert evidence: law, science and medicine in summit. The rapporteur’s view-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The reliability and validity of expert evidence: law, science and medicine in summit. The rapporteur’s view

Published:2020-01-07 Issue:3 Volume:52 Page:246-248
ISSN:0045-0618
Container-title:Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

Author:

Ross Alastair¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Academic Programs, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Melbourne, Australia

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00450618.2019.1711183

Reference7 articles.

1. Science and Technology Select Committee. Forensic science and the criminal justice system: a blueprint for change; 2019. Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldsctech/333/333.pd

2. Justia: USA Supreme Court, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579; 1993:P2. Available from: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/509/579/

3. Court of appeal reaffirms gatekeeping function for potential experts. Meady v. Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp; 2015 ONCA 6 (CanLII). Available from: https://canliiconnects.org/en/commentaries/35667

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An evaluation of novice, expert and supervised machine learning model classifications for forensic hair analysis;Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences;2023-09-26

2. Forensic hair analysis – Worldwide survey results;Forensic Science International;2021-10

3. Contemporary issues in forensic science—Worldwide survey results;Forensic Science International;2021-03