Regional-scale non-market benefits of improved lakes and rivers when perceived and monitored ecological status diverge-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Regional-scale non-market benefits of improved lakes and rivers when perceived and monitored ecological status diverge

Published:2023-04-05 Issue: Volume: Page:1-19
ISSN:0964-0568
Container-title:Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Author:

Lehtoranta Virpi¹^ORCID,Hjerppe Turo²^ORCID,Kosenius Anna-Kaisa³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Finnish Environment Institute (Syke), Helsinki, Finland

2. Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland

3. Department of Economics and Management, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Funder

Ministry of Environment Finland

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,General Environmental Science,Water Science and Technology,Geography, Planning and Development

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09640568.2023.2190487

Reference54 articles.

1. Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation

2. Modelling asymmetric preferences for water quality in choice experiments with individual-specific status quo alternatives

3. Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty

4. Alvarez, S., and S. Asci. 2014. “Estimating the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Using Meta-Analysis and Benefits Transfer.” Paper presented at the annual meeting for the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Dallas TX, February 1-4.

5. Subjective vs. objective measures in the valuation of water quality