Response to letter to the editor: “Clinical controversies in the management of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of four important but controversial aspects of acute pulmonary embolism management that are still subject of debate and research”-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Response to letter to the editor: “Clinical controversies in the management of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of four important but controversial aspects of acute pulmonary embolism management that are still subject of debate and research”

Published:2023-05-19 Issue:6 Volume:17 Page:427-428
ISSN:1747-6348
Container-title:Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine

Author:

Luijten Dieuwke¹^ORCID,Klok Frederikus A¹^ORCID,van Mens Thijs E¹²^ORCID,Huisman Menno V¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

2. Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Immunology and Allergy

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17476348.2023.2215015

Reference8 articles.

1. Letter to the editor: “Clinical controversies in the management of acute pulmonary embolism”

2. Prognostic value of echocardiography-derived right ventricular dysfunction in haemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

3. Prognostic value of right ventricular dysfunction or elevated cardiac biomarkers in patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

4. Regional right ventricular dysfunction in acute pulmonary embolism: relationship with clot burden and biomarker profile

5. Relation Among Clot Burden, Right-Sided Heart Strain, and Adverse Events After Acute Pulmonary Embolism