Comparison of User Reaction to Two Methods of Strong Interest Inventory Administration and Report Feedback-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of User Reaction to Two Methods of Strong Interest Inventory Administration and Report Feedback

Published:1997-10-01 Issue:3 Volume:30 Page:115-127
ISSN:0748-1756
Container-title:Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
language:en
Short-container-title:Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

Author:

Hansen Jo-Ida C.¹,Neuman Jody L.¹,Haverkamp Beth E.²,Lubinski Barbara R.³

Affiliation:

1. Jo-Ida C. Hansen is a professor, and Jody L. Neuman is a graduate research assistant, both in the Department of Psychology at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

2. Beth E. Haverkamp is an associate professor in the Department of Counselling Psychology at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

3. Barbara R. Lubinski is a consultant at Personnel Decisions in Minneapolis.

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Psychology (miscellaneous),Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07481756.1997.12068932

Reference28 articles.

1. Effects of Computerized Administration on Scores on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Interest inventories;Handbook of Psychological Assessment;2019

2. Statistical Considerations in the Psychometric Validation of Outcome Measures;Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;2013-11

3. Computerized Adaptive Assessment of Personality Disorder: Introducing the CAT–PD Project;Journal of Personality Assessment;2011-07

4. Comparaison des effets de trois modes de restitution de questionnaires d’intérêts: nomothétique, constructiviste et intégré;L’Orientation scolaire et professionnelle;2009-06-15

5. Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent?;Ergonomics;2008-09