What did Quebeckers Want? Impact of Question Wording, Constitutional Proposal and Context on Support for Sovereignty, 1976

What did Quebeckers Want? Impact of Question Wording, Constitutional Proposal and Context on Support for Sovereignty, 1976–2008

Published:2011-09 Issue:3 Volume:41 Page:242-258
ISSN:0272-2011
Container-title:American Review of Canadian Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:American Review of Canadian Studies

Author:

Yale François,Durand Claire

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Earth-Surface Processes,Geography, Planning and Development

Link

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02722011.2011.594517

Reference25 articles.

1. Attentes économiques et linguistiques et appui à la souveraineté du Québec: une analyse prospective et comparative

2. Bryk, Anthony, Stephen, S. and Raudenbush, W. 1992.Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and data analysis methods, 265Newbury Park: Sage.

3. Choosing Canada? The 1995 Quebec Sovereignty Referendum

4. Cloutier, É., Guay, J.H. and Latouche, D. 1992.Le virage: l'évolution de l'opinion publique au Québec depuis 1960 ou Comment le Québec est devenu souverainiste. Éditions Québec/Amérique181Montréal

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Les courants nationalistes à l’épreuve des générations : analyses des attitudes et choix de vote des Québécois.es de 2007 à 2022;Canadian Journal of Political Science;2024-05-03

2. Compulsory voting, economic conditions and turnout: explaining the outcome of constitutional referendums;West European Politics;2024-01-12

3. Le Bloc québécois et la souveraineté : une analyse des communiqués de presse de 2002 à 2021;Canadian Journal of Political Science;2024-01-09

4. Secession and Secessionist Movements;Encyclopedia of Law and Economics;2024

5. Is Quebec independence still key in making sense of Canadian elections? A longitudinal analysis (2000–2021);Regional & Federal Studies;2023-07-11