Identity-policy discrepancy: crisis perception, third-order change and the shifting foreign policy trajectories of China and Japan toward Northeast Asia-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Identity-policy discrepancy: crisis perception, third-order change and the shifting foreign policy trajectories of China and Japan toward Northeast Asia

Published:2024-02-05 Issue: Volume: Page:1-26
ISSN:1356-9775
Container-title:Contemporary Politics
language:en
Short-container-title:Contemporary Politics

Author:

Liu Minran¹²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Discipline of Government and International Relations, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

2. School of Humanities & Social Sciences, UNSW Canberra at the Australian Defence Force Academy (ADFA), Canberra, Australia

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13569775.2024.2311985

Reference97 articles.

1. Abe S. (2013a). Speech ‘Japan is Back’ at The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). February 22 2013. Retrieved May 15 2018 from https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/attachments/130222_speech_abe.pdf

2. Abe S. (2013b). Official statement of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe issued by Prime minister of Japan and his cabinet. March 15 2013. Retrieved July 30 2020 from https://japan.kantei.go.jp/96_abe/statement/201303/15kaiken_e.html

3. Akaha, T., & Hirata, K. (2021). Us bilateralism under Trump, power shift in East Asia, and implications for regional security and prosperity: A theoretical analysis of Japan’s strategic adjustment. In T. Akaha, J. Yuan, & W. Liang (Eds.), Trump’s America and international relations in the Indo-Pacific. Contributions to international relations (pp. 19–52). Springer.

4. Ashizawa, K. (2013). Japan, the US, and regional institution-building in the New Asia: When identity matters. Palgrave Macmillan.

5. Geoeconomics with Chinese characteristics: the BRI and China’s evolving grand strategy