Expertise or ideology? A response to Morris et al. 2016, ‘Circumcision is a primary preventive against HIV infection: Critique of a contrary meta-regression analysis by Van Howe’-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Expertise or ideology? A response to Morris et al. 2016, ‘Circumcision is a primary preventive against HIV infection: Critique of a contrary meta-regression analysis by Van Howe’

Published:2017-01-10 Issue:12 Volume:13 Page:1900-1918
ISSN:1744-1692
Container-title:Global Public Health
language:en
Short-container-title:Global Public Health

Author:

Van Howe Robert S.¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Saginaw, MI, USA

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17441692.2016.1272939

Reference109 articles.

1. Bringing Early Infant Male Circumcision Information Home to the Family: Demographic Characteristics and Perspectives of Clients in a Pilot Project in Tanzania

2. Economics of antiretroviral treatment vs. circumcision for HIV prevention

3. HIV prevention: Making male circumcision the ‘right’ tool for the job

4. Male circumcision and risk of HIV in women

5. Symptomatic urinary tract infection in boys in the first year of life with special reference to scar formation

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comment on ‘Changing relationships between HIV prevalence and circumcision in Lesotho’, and ‘Age-incidence and prevalence of HIV among intact and circumcised men: an analysis of PHIA surveys in Southern Africa’;Journal of Biosocial Science;2024-05-20

2. Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision: Responding to Brian Morris;Clinical Infectious Diseases;2021-03-02

3. What is the best age to circumcise? A medical and ethical analysis;Bioethics;2020-02-18

4. Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review;Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine;2019-09-08