Triple-blind review as a solution to gender bias in academic publishing, a theoretical approach-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Triple-blind review as a solution to gender bias in academic publishing, a theoretical approach

Published:2022-05-30 Issue:12 Volume:47 Page:2487-2496
ISSN:0307-5079
Container-title:Studies in Higher Education
language:en
Short-container-title:Studies in Higher Education

Author:

Conklin Michael¹,Singh Satvir²

Affiliation:

1. Accounting, Economics, & Finance, Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX, USA

2. Management & Marketing, Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX, USA

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Education

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03075079.2022.2081681

Reference36 articles.

1. History of Medical Records and Peer Review

2. Towards gender equality in scientific careers: Are we there yet? … Are we there yet? … Are we there yet?

3. Belot, H. (2017). Blind Recruitment Trial to Boost Gender Equality Making Things Worse, Study Reveals. ABC News, June 29. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-30/bilnd-recruitment-trial-to-improve-gender-equality-failing-study/8664888.

4. Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals

5. Boyd, R. S. 2003. “Gender Shows Up in Writing.” Chicago Tribune, May 28. https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2003-05-28-0305280247-story.html.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Editors are biased too: An extension of Fox et al. (2023)'s analysis makes the case for triple‐blind review;Functional Ecology;2024-02

2. Impostor feelings and academic decision making: an anchoring vignette approach;Studies in Higher Education;2023-09-14

3. Distribution of Female and Male First and Last Authorship across Drug Delivery Related Journals with Respect to Year and Journal Impact Factor;Molecular Pharmaceutics;2023-06-23

4. Overcoming the gender bias in ecology and evolution: is the double-anonymized peer review an effective pathway over time?;PeerJ;2023-04-10