Institutional design and polarization. Do consensus democracies fare better in fighting polarization than majoritarian democracies?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Institutional design and polarization. Do consensus democracies fare better in fighting polarization than majoritarian democracies?

Published:2022-09-30 Issue:2 Volume:30 Page:153-172
ISSN:1351-0347
Container-title:Democratization
language:en
Short-container-title:Democratization

Author:

Bernaerts Kamil¹²^ORCID,Blanckaert Benjamin¹^ORCID,Caluwaerts Didier¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium

2. Department of Political and International Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

Funder

Research Foundation – Flanders

ERA-NET NORFACE

EUTOPIA Institutional Partnership

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13510347.2022.2117300

Reference88 articles.

1. Is Polarization a Myth?

2. ACLED. “Data from: The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project: Dashboard. ACLED Data” [Dataset]. https://acleddata.com/dashboard/#/dashboard, 2022.

3. Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems

4. The Spatial Structure of Party Competition: Party Dispersion within a Finite Policy Space

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Awareness of opinion change: evidence from two deliberative mini-publics;Frontiers in Political Science;2024-01-05

2. Elite polarization and democratic backsliding in Tunisia: tracing agency-driven mechanisms;Democratization;2023-12-03

3. Deliberation and polarization: a multi-disciplinary review;Frontiers in Political Science;2023-06-29

4. Ideological identity, issue-based ideology and bipolar affective polarization in multiparty systems: The cases of Argentina, Chile, Italy, Portugal and Spain;Electoral Studies;2023-06