‘Trustworthy’ systematic reviews can only result in meaningful conclusions if the quality of randomized clinical trials and the certainty of evidence improves: an update on the ‘trustworthy’ living systematic review project-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

‘Trustworthy’ systematic reviews can only result in meaningful conclusions if the quality of randomized clinical trials and the certainty of evidence improves: an update on the ‘trustworthy’ living systematic review project

Published:2024-07-03 Issue:4 Volume:32 Page:363-367
ISSN:1066-9817
Container-title:Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy

Author:

Riley Sean P.¹,Flowers Daniel W.²,Swanson Brian T.³,Shaffer Stephen M.³,Cook Chad E.⁴⁵,Brismée Jean-Michel⁶

Affiliation:

1. Hartford Healthcare Rehabilitation Network, Glastonbury, CT, USA

2. Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA

3. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT, USA

4. Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) Division, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

5. Duke Center for Excellence in Manual and Manipulative Therapy, Durham, NC, USA

6. Center for Rehabilitation Research, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10669817.2024.2377490

Reference44 articles.

1. Can we trust strong recommendations based on low quality evidence?

2. An overused phrase: interpreted with caution

3. Protocol for the development of a ‘trustworthy’ living systematic review and meta analyses of manual therapy interventions to treat neuromusculoskeletal impairments

4. Post-randomization bias

5. “Trustworthiness,” confidence in estimated effects, and confidently translating research into clinical practice