Volume and value recovery comparison of processor and conventional systems in pine stands of the U.S. South-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Volume and value recovery comparison of processor and conventional systems in pine stands of the U.S. South

Published:2019-09-09 Issue:1 Volume:31 Page:29-36
ISSN:1494-2119
Container-title:International Journal of Forest Engineering
language:en
Short-container-title:International Journal of Forest Engineering

Author:

Grove Patrick M.¹,Conrad, IV Joseph L.²,Dahlen Joseph²

Affiliation:

1. International Paper Company, Oglethorpe, GA, USA

2. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14942119.2019.1663032

Reference45 articles.

1. Minnesota's Logging Businesses: An Assessment of the Health and Viability of the Sector

2. Blinn CR, Snyder SA, Russell MB, Peterson RR. 2019. Status of the Minnesota logging sector in 2016. St. Paul (MN): University of Minnesota Department of Forest Resources. Staff Paper Series No. 251.

3. Value Recovery from Two Mechanized Bucking Operations in the Southeastern United States

4. Bullock B 1998. Modeling green weight of loblolly pine (Pinus taedaL.) [master’s thesis]. Blacksburg (VA): Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Applying an Optimum Bucking Method to Comparing the Volume and Value Recovery of Cut-to-Length and Tree-Length Merchandizing Systems in Piedmont and the Coastal Plain;Forests;2024-03-18

2. Comparison between Different Mechanization Systems: Economic Sustainability of Harvesting Poplar Plantations in Italy;Forests;2024-02-20

3. Productivity and cost assessment of two harvesting methods for medium-rotation poplar plantations;Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research;2023-02-13