M is For Performance Validity: The IOP-M Provides a Cost-Effective Measure of the Credibility of Memory Deficits during Neuropsychological Evaluations-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

M is For Performance Validity: The IOP-M Provides a Cost-Effective Measure of the Credibility of Memory Deficits during Neuropsychological Evaluations

Published:2023-01-19 Issue: Volume: Page:1-17
ISSN:2473-2850
Container-title:Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice

Author:

Erdodi Laszlo¹^ORCID,Calamia Matthew²^ORCID,Holcomb Matthew³,Robinson Anthony⁴^ORCID,Rasmussen Lauren³,Bianchini Kevin³

Affiliation:

1. Psychology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada

2. Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA

3. Jefferson Neurobehavioral Group, NA, Metairie, Louisiana, USA

4. Psychology, Louisiana State Senate, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Applied Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/24732850.2023.2168581

Reference94 articles.

1. The Importance of Demographically Adjusted Cutoffs: Age and Education Bias in Raw Score Cutoffs Within the Trail Making Test

2. Detecting Negative Response Bias Within the Trauma Symptom Inventory–2 (TSI-2): a Review of the Literature

3. Reexamining performance validity cutoffs within the Complex Ideational Material and the Boston Naming Test–Short Form using an experimental malingering paradigm

4. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test performance validity indices in a VA Polytrauma sample

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP-29) and Inventory of Problems–Memory (IOP-M) failure rates in patients with severe psychosis with and without criminal convictions;Psychiatry, Psychology and Law;2024-09-08

2. Performance validity testing: the need for digital technology and where to go from here;Frontiers in Psychology;2024-08-13

3. The Cross-Cultural Applicability of the Inventory of Problems – 29 (IOP-29): A Replication of Akca et al. (2023) Using a Serbian Sample;Psychological Injury and Law;2024-08-07

4. Using the MMPI-2-RF, IOP-29, IOP-M, and FIT in the In-Person and Remote Administration Formats: A Simulation Study on Feigned mTBI;Assessment;2024-03-11

5. Seeing Clearly in the Twilight: The Clinical and Forensic Relevance of the Indeterminate/Borderline Range in Multivariate Models of Performance Validity Assessment;Psychological Injury and Law;2024-03-08