Hormesis Predicts Low-Dose Responses Better Than Threshold Models

Author:

Calabrese Edward J.1,Stanek Edward J.2,Nascarella Marc A.1,Hoffmann George R.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Sciences Division, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA

2. Department of Public Health, Biostatistics and Epidemiology Division, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA

3. Department of Biology, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA

Abstract

This study evaluated characteristics of the concentration-response relationships of chemicals from the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) Yeast Anticancer Drug Screen database with respect to the threshold and the hormetic dose-response models. The database reported concentration-response studies of 2189 chemicals from a broad range of chemical classes. The biological end point was growth in 13 strains of yeast ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae), most of which contain genetic alterations affecting DNA repair or cell cycle control. The analysis was limited to studies that satisfied a priori entry criteria for evaluation, including having two or more concentrations in the nontoxic zone (below a Benchmark Dose). The mean growth response compared to untreated controls of these doses was significantly greater than 100% in all 13 yeast strains, ranging from ~105% to ~111%. Under a threshold model, one would expect values more closely approximating 100%. Moreover, the distribution of responses below the BMD5 for chemicals was shifted upwardly from the expectations of a threshold model for all strains. These results indicate that for the chemicals and yeast strains studied, the responses are more consistent with a hormetic model than a threshold model, and they strengthen previous results presented by Calabrese et al. (2006 , Toxicol. Sci. 94:368–378). Taken together, the analyses provide strong evidence for hormesis, a phenomenon with a broad range of biomedical and toxicological implications.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Toxicology

Cited by 98 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3