Ingredients and Meals Rather Than Recipes: A Proposal for Research That Does Not Treat Usability Evaluation Methods as Indivisible Wholes-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Ingredients and Meals Rather Than Recipes: A Proposal for Research That Does Not Treat Usability Evaluation Methods as Indivisible Wholes

Published:2011-10 Issue:10 Volume:27 Page:940-970
ISSN:1044-7318
Container-title:International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
language:en
Short-container-title:International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Author:

Woolrych Alan,Hornbæk Kasper,Frøkjær Erik,Cockton Gilbert

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Human-Computer Interaction,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Link

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10447318.2011.555314

Reference69 articles.

1. The user action framework: a reliable foundation for usability engineering support tools

2. Bailey, R. W., Allan, R. W. and Raiello, P. Usability testing vs. heuristic evaluation: A head-to-head comparison. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting. pp.409–413.

3. A comparative evaluation of heuristic-based usability inspection methods

4. Cockton, G. and Lavery, D. A framework for usability problem extraction. Proceedings of the IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Vol. 9, pp.344–352.

Cited by 49 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Making sense of methods and approaches to user involvement;The Design Journal;2024-05-15

2. Building an Ethics-Focused Action Plan: Roles, Process Moves, and Trajectories;Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2024-05-11

3. Situational selections of design methods for digital innovation processes;International Journal of Innovation Science;2023-12-14

4. The Empathic Co-Design Canvas: A Tool for Supporting Multi-Stakeholder Co-Design Processes;INT J DES;2023

5. Experiences of Inclusive Action and Social Design Research with Social Workers and People with Intellectual Disabilities;Social Sciences;2022-03-10