Balancing Stakeholders with an Imbalanced Budget: How Continued Inequities in Wildlife Funding Maintains Old Management Styles-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Balancing Stakeholders with an Imbalanced Budget: How Continued Inequities in Wildlife Funding Maintains Old Management Styles

Published:2006-12 Issue:6 Volume:11 Page:455-458
ISSN:1087-1209
Container-title:Human Dimensions of Wildlife
language:en
Short-container-title:Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Author:

Anderson Laura E.,Loomis David K.

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation

Link

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10871200600984513

Reference5 articles.

1. Allore, S. 1998. “Nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation: An examination of the Teaming with Wildlife Initiative”. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst. Master's Project.

2. From clients to stakeholders: A philosophical shift for fish and wildlife management

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ten lessons for rare wildlife species conservation when coming from a common species background;Conservation Science and Practice;2024-07-19

2. Using cost‐effectiveness analysis to compare density‐estimation methods for large‐scale wildlife management;Wildlife Society Bulletin;2023-02-22

3. The Relationship between Wildlife Recreationists' Familiarity with State Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Recreation Identity, and Future Financial Contributions;North American Journal of Fisheries Management;2022-11-20

4. Stakeholder Support for Wildlife Conservation Funding Policies;Frontiers in Conservation Science;2021-11-04

5. Determinants of Support for Funding Options for Fish and Wildlife Conservation in Wisconsin;Wildlife Society Bulletin;2021-09