The Effects of Time, Access, and Question Type on Response Accuracy and Frequency of Lookbacks in Older, Proficient Readers

Author:

Alexander Patricia A.1,Hare Victoria Chou2,Garner Ruth3

Affiliation:

1. Texas A&M University, Department of Educational Curriculum & Instruction, College Station, TX 77843

2. University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education, Chicago, IL 60680

3. University of Maryland, Reading Center, College Park, MD 20742

Abstract

This investigation examined the effects of variation in conditions for learning on lookback use and response accuracy in proficient readers and explored readers' awareness of their strategic behavior. Fifty-two college undergraduates studied a 1300-word expository passage and answered three text-based questions and one reader-based question. Half of the subjects worked under a 10-minute time limit, while the others had unlimited time. For half of the subjects, questions were presented with the passage; for the other half, questions were received after the passage had been studied and turned over. Analysis revealed that subjects who had the questions presented with the text looked back more and responded more accurately than did those receiving questions separately. Time limit did not affect use of lookbacks or accuracy, and subjects looked back for text-based questions only. Based on comparison with observational data, post-task verbal reports were found to be fairly accurate records of lookback use.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3