An ethnoarchaeological comparison of observed butchery actions to bone surface modifications of the Dobe !Kung San-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An ethnoarchaeological comparison of observed butchery actions to bone surface modifications of the Dobe !Kung San

Published:2023-11-24 Issue: Volume: Page:1-15
ISSN:0891-2963
Container-title:Historical Biology
language:en
Short-container-title:Historical Biology

Author:

Kunitz Suzanne¹,Pobiner Briana²,Yellen John³,Faith J. Tyler⁴,Brooks Alison S.¹

Affiliation:

1. Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, US

2. Anthropology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, US

3. Archaeology, National Science Foundation, Arlington, US

4. Natural History Museum of Utah and Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, US

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08912963.2023.2278151

Reference35 articles.

1. Bartram LE, Kroll EM, Bunn HT. 1991. Variability in camp structure and bone food refuse pattern at Kua San hunter-gatherer camps. In: Kroll EK, Price TD, editors. The Interpretation of Archaeologial Spatial Patterns. New York and London: Plenum; pp. 77–148.

2. Binford LR. 1978. Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology. New York: Academic Press.

3. Butchering, sharing, and the archaeological record

4. Blind Tests of Inter-analyst Correspondence and Accuracy in the Identification of Cut Marks, Percussion Marks, and Carnivore Tooth Marks on Bone Surfaces

5. Brooks A, Yellen J. 1987. The preservation of activity areas in the archaeological record. In: Kent S, editor. Method and theory for activity area research: an ethnoarchaeological approach. New York: Columbia University Press; pp. 63–106.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Understanding cutting edge selection from the perspective of modern stone tool users;2024