Is it time to ‘decolonise’ the fungibility debate?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Is it time to ‘decolonise’ the fungibility debate?

Published:2019-09-30 Issue:1 Volume:41 Page:42-57
ISSN:0143-6597
Container-title:Third World Quarterly
language:en
Short-container-title:Third World Quarterly

Author:

Rana Zunera¹²^ORCID,Koch Dirk-Jan²

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Society and Economics, Rhine Waal University of Applied Sciences, Kleve, Germany;

2. Department of Anthropology and Social Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Development

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01436597.2019.1665012

Reference44 articles.

1. Preference Revelation and Public Goods

2. Baydag, Rena Melis, Stephan Klingebiel, and Paul Marschall. Shaping the Patterns of Aid Allocation: A Comparative Analysis of Seven Bilateral Donors and the European Union. Discussion Paper. Bonn, Germany: German Development Institute, 2018.

3. Bilateral Donors' Interest vs. Recipients' Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same?

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Food Aid Shocks and Food Insecurity: Does Democracy Matter?;The European Journal of Development Research;2024-03-30

2. Unintended Consequences of Externally Aided Projects on Fiscal Transfers: a Subnational Study of India;2024

3. Foreign Aid, Winning Coalitions, and Economic Growth;Asian Survey;2023-07-19

4. Budget support to the health sector—The right choice for strong institutions? Evidence from panel data;Review of Development Economics;2022-12-30

5. The generational status quo explained: longitudinal case studies of small Dutch NGOs;International Development Planning Review;2022-10