Evidentiary discrepancies in sexual assault casework within the US-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Evidentiary discrepancies in sexual assault casework within the US

Published:2021-07-03 Issue:3 Volume:6 Page:189-194
ISSN:2096-1790
Container-title:Forensic Sciences Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Forensic Sciences Research

Author:

Williams Chinyere M.¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemistry and Forensics, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Anthropology,Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous),Pathology and Forensic Medicine,Analytical Chemistry

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/20961790.2021.1960465

Reference28 articles.

1. US Government Accountability Office (GAO). DNA evidence: DOJ Should Improve Performance Measurement and Properly Design Controls for Nationwide Grant Program. Washington, DC: US GAO; 2019. (GAO-19-16).

2. Justice Denied: Low Submission Rates of Sexual Assault Kits and the Predicting Variables

3. The Problem of Untested Sexual Assault Kits

4. Forgotten evidence: A mixed methods study of why sexual assault kits (SAKs) are not submitted for DNA forensic testing.

5. Why Police“Couldn't or Wouldn't”Submit Sexual Assault Kits for Forensic DNA Testing: A Focal Concerns Theory Analysis of Untested Rape Kits

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Processing the Backlog of Sexual Assault Evidence From a Brazilian Forensic Genetics Laboratory Using Automation;Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences and Forensic Medicine;2024-06-18