1. Robert Terry, “Funding the Way to Open Access,”PLoS Biology3, no. 3, March 2005. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030097 [not yet online at the time of this writing].
2. Wellcome Trust, “Annual Report and Financial Statements 2004,” p. 5; see http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/assets/wtd015233.pdf (accessed March 8, 2005).
3. “Report of the CUL Task Force on Open Access Publishing Presented to the Cornell University Library Management Team August 9, 2004”; see http://www.dspace.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/193 (accessed March 8, 2005).
4. Andrew Albanese, “Cornell: Open Access Costly,”Library Journal Newswire, February 1, 2005; see http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA498857?display=NewsNews&industry=News&industryid=1986 and verticalid=151 (accessed March 8, 2005).
5. It may be the case that concerns similar to the ones described here were what led the Cornell University Library Library Management Team to append the following “Clarification” to the front page of the report on October 7, 2004: “This Report of the Cornell University Library's Task Force on Open Access represents the Task Force's initial examination into the Open Access publishing model and its impact on the Library. On October 7, 2004 the Library Management Team reviewed the report and requested additional analysis, particularly with regard to the underlying economic model from an institutional, rather than library, perspective and more consideration of projected costs and benefits, especially when considered from a multi-institutional or consortial point of view.”