1. If there has been growth, it has been slow. Alma Swan's 2005 report at Key Perspectives shows a growth from around 10% to 20%. Growth is good, of course, but the overall numbers are not enough to make a movement. “How [and why] publishers can work with institutional repositories.” Presented at the Society for Scholarly Publishing's annual conference, Boston (June 2005). Available at http://www.keyperspectives.co.uk/openaccessarchive/Conference%2520presentations/Swan%2520-%2520SSP%2520presentation.pdf.
2. Alma, Swan and Sheridan, Brown, Open Access Self-Archiving: An Author Study, (Truro, U.K: Key Perspectives Ltd, 2005). Available at http://www.keyperspectives.co.uk/openaccessarchive/reports.html.
3. Anthony Watkinson, e-mail to liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, November 25, 2007.
4. One survey reports on thirty faculty members at the University of Rochester. Susan Gibbons, “Making the Repository a Success with your Academic Staff” Rochester, NY: University of Rochester, June 29, 2006), 20. Available at http://www.apsr.edu.au/successful/gibbons1.ppt. A second survey studied content recruitment leaders from fifty-four institutions with IRs. John Potter, “Perceptions about Content Recruitment Strategies Over Time,” Journal of Institutional Repository Research 1 (2007): 1–8. Available at http://www.freewebs.com/academicportfolio/perceptions.pdf.
5. “DSpace: Durable Digital Archives,” http://web.mit.edu/edtech/casestudies/dspace.html (accessed December 13, 2007).