Distinguishing Suicidal from Non-Suicidal Deliberate Self-Harm Events in Women with Borderline Personality Disorder

Author:

Maddock Gillian R.1,Carter Gregory L.2,Murrell Elizabeth R.1,Lewin Terry J.3,Conrad Agatha M.3

Affiliation:

1. Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia

2. Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Locked Bag #7, Hunter Region Mail Centre, NSW 2310, Australia

3. Centre for Brain and Mental Health Research, University of Newcastle and Hunter New England Mental Health, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Objective: Deliberate self-harm (DSH) is common in Borderline Personality Disorder, may be due to a variety of reasons, and is associated with different degrees of suicidal intent. Understanding the reasons for episodes of DSH in this population may be helpful in developing interventions to reduce the rate of DSH or to assist in the clinical judgement of suicidal intention after DSH has occurred. Methods: The Parasuicide History Interview, version 2 (PHI-2) was used to determine the reasons for DSH events in 70 Australian women diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder. Factor analysis of the responses identified four empirically derived component factors. Multivariate models were developed to identify the independent predictors of suicidal deliberate self-harm (S-DSH) versus non-suicidal deliberate self-harm (NS-DSH) events. Results: Participants and raters showed strong agreement in classifying S-DSH and NS-DSH events. Methods used that involved self-poisoning, jumping or stabbing showed increased risk for S-DSH, adjusted odds ratio 12.07 (95% CI 2.17, 67.29), compared to the referent group, external damage to skin with no rescue contact being sought. Although no grouping of reasons were independently significant, the lower the effectiveness of the DSH event to resolve the reasons for the event, the higher the risk of it having been a S-DSH event. Conclusion: In clinical situations, any Borderline Personality Disorder patient seeking help or medical attention, using any method other than superficial external injury to skin, or reporting a failure to effectively resolve the reasons for the DSH event, should be considered as likely to have had a S-DSH event (greater suicidal intention). However, specific reasons for the DSH event, or individual subject characteristics, did not meaningfully distinguish S-DSH from NS-DSH events.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. Fatal and non-fatal repetition of self-harm

2. Deliberate self-harm in Oxford, 1990–2000: a time of change in patient characteristics

3. Royal College of Psychiatrists. The general hospital management of adult deliberate self-harm. A consensus statement on standards for service provision. Council Report CR32 London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 1994: 1–21.

4. Australasian College of Emergency Medicine and Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. Guidelines for the Management of Deliberate Self Harm in Young People. Melbourne, Australia: Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP); 2000.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3