In what ways might the concept of ‘planetary health’ lead us to think differently about contemporary global challenges? How could the resulting insights promote the changing of current practices?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

In what ways might the concept of ‘planetary health’ lead us to think differently about contemporary global challenges? How could the resulting insights promote the changing of current practices?

Published:2024-07-02 Issue:3 Volume:40 Page:295-305
ISSN:1362-3699
Container-title:Medicine, Conflict and Survival
language:en
Short-container-title:Medicine, Conflict and Survival

Author:

Edwards Nico¹

Affiliation:

1. International Relations, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13623699.2024.2382832

Reference58 articles.

1. BUEN VIVIR:

2. Akkerman Mark Nick Buxton Wendela de Vries Deborah Burton and Ho-Chih Lin. 2023. “Climate Crossfire: How NATO’s 2% Military Spending Targets Contribute to Climate.” Transnational Institute. October 17. Accessed January 15 2024. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/climate-crossfire.

3. Akkerman Mark Nick Buxton Wendela de Vries Deborah Burton Ho-Chih Lin and Muhammed Al-Kashef. 2022. “Climate Collateral: How Military Spending Accelerates Climate Breakdown.” Transnational Institute. November 14. Accessed January 15 2024. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/climate-collateral.

4. Buxton Nick. 2021. “A Primer on Climate Security: The Dangers of Militarising the Climate Crisis.” The Transnational Institute. October. Accessed January 15 2024. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/primer-on-climate-security.

5. CEOBS. 2022. “How does war damage the environment?” Conflict and Environment Observatory (04 June 2020). Accessed January 15 2024. https://ceobs.org/how-does-war-damage-the-environment/#:~:text=Weapons%20and%20military%20materiel%20used metals%20and%20toxic%20energetic%20materials.