Can Novices Trust Themselves to Choose Trustworthy Experts? Reasons for (Reserved) Optimism-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Can Novices Trust Themselves to Choose Trustworthy Experts? Reasons for (Reserved) Optimism

Published:2020-01-13 Issue:3 Volume:34 Page:227-240
ISSN:0269-1728
Container-title:Social Epistemology
language:en
Short-container-title:Social Epistemology

Author:

Brennan Johnny¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Philosophy, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, USA

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

General Social Sciences,Philosophy

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02691728.2019.1703056

Reference46 articles.

1. Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony

2. Debunking Biased Thinkers (Including Ourselves)

3. Epistemic Trespassing

4. Personality traits and echo chambers on facebook

5. Brooks, A. C. 2017. “Don’t Shun Conservative Professors.” The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/15/opinion/conservative-professors.html?_r=0

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Six Roles for Inclination;Mind;2024-09-11

2. No Trespassing! Abandoning the Novice/Expert Problem;Erkenntnis;2024-03-08

3. Does public justification face an ‘expert problem’? Some thoughts in light of the COVID-19 pandemic;Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy;2024-02-13

4. Development of English listening test items based on IRT theory;International Conference on Mathematical and Statistical Physics, Computational Science, Education and Communication (ICMSCE 2023);2023-12-20

5. Shooting the Messenger: How Expert Statements on Stigmatized Populations Negatively Impact Perceived Credibility;Justice Quarterly;2023-10-14