(Re)development, Complexity and Networks: A Framework for Research

Author:

Doak Joe1,Karadimitriou Nikos2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Real Estate and Planning, University of Reading, PO Box 219, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AW,

2. Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, Wates House, 22 Gordon Street, London, WCIH OQB, UK, n.karadimitriou@ucl. ac.uk

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual framework for the examination of land redevelopment based on a complex systems/networks approach. The agents and networks involved in property development can be seen as constituents of structures that perform complex processes. These structures interact, forming new more complex structures and networks. Redevelopment then can be conceptualised as a process of transformation: a complex system, involving developers, planners, landowners, investors, community groups, etc., through which a previously used site is transformed into new network space. Analysis of network relations points towards the 'duality' of structure and agency in these processes of system transformation and change. Insights from actor network theory can be conjoined with notions of complexity and chaos to build an understanding of the ways in which actors actively seek to shape these structures and systems, whilst at the same time being recursively shaped by them in their strategies and actions. Better understanding of the interactions between actors and the emergent qualities of the networks they form can improve our comprehension of the complex socio-spatial phenomena that redevelopment comprises.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Urban Studies,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Reference93 articles.

1. Adams, D., Disberry, A., Hutchinson, N. and Munjoma, T. (2002) Brownfield land: owner characteristics, attitudes and networks, in: Y. Rydin and A. Thornley (Eds) Planning in the UK: Agendas for the New Millennium, pp. 317-336. Aldershot: Ashgate.

2. Adams, G. and Cantor, R. (2001) Risk, stigma and property value: what are people afraid of? in: J. FLYN, P. Slovic and H. Kunreuther (Eds) Risk, Media and Stigma, pp. 175-185. London: Earthscan.

3. Akrich, M. (1992) The de-scription of technical objects, in: W. E. BIJKER and J. LAw (Eds) Shaping Technology—Building Society: Studies in Socio-technical Change, pp. 205-224. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.

4. More Is Different

Cited by 49 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3