Affiliation:
1. Local Economy Policy Unit, South Bank University, 202 Wandsworth Road, London, SW8 2JZ, UK,
Abstract
The institutional structure and urban policy preferences of the Blair administration have now emerged from the British government's comprehensive spending review. In a series of recent publications, notably from the Department of Transport, Environment and the Regions (DETR) and the Social Exclusion Unit (SEU) report Bringing Britain Together, the government places a welcome emphasis on the importance of working with communities and in community economic development. Unfortunately though, these initiatives contrast with a simultaneous commitment to fiscal restraint and work-based labour market policies, which seem to mark continuity. The extent to which the urban policy agenda and institutions are open to influence from community organisations promoting social justice claims that differ from those of government is therefore unclear. This paper uses Healey's 'collaborative planning' approach to explore the potential for the engagement of one such community organisation, Local Exchange Trading Schemes (LETS), to test the extent to which the new policy institutions are open to influence 'from below'.
Subject
Urban Studies,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Reference66 articles.
1. Aaronovitch, S. (1996) A typology of evaluation, in: S. Aaronovitch and T. Agath-Angelou (1997) Urban Regeneration: Evaluation as a Tool for Policy Development, pp. 16-20. Local Economy Policy Unit, South Bank University , London.
2. Growth coalitions and local economic development strategy in southern England
3. Partnership Agencies British
4. Postmodern Theory
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献