Administrative Practices in Russia's Housing Allowance Programme

Author:

Struyk Raymond J.1,Puzanov Alexander S.2,Kolodeznikova Anastasia3

Affiliation:

1. Urban Institute, 2100 M Street, NW, Washington, DC, USA,

2. Institute for Urban Economics, Lusinovskaya ul. 36, Moscow 113093, Russian Federation,

3. USAID, the Urban Institute

Abstract

Implementation of housing allowances is an integral part of Russia's programme of systematic rent increases on state and municipal rental units which began in 1994. Because housing allowances constitute the country's first income-tested programme, its performance transcends the housing sector. Rents are being increased in steps to cover full operating costs by the middle of the current decade. Primary administrative responsibility for the programme rests at the local level. Since the rate at which rents increase is determined by each municipality, progress varies. Arguably, the quality of the programme's administration may influence acceptance of both the programme and broader economic and political reforms. Reported here are the results of a first-time assessment of the practices of local housing allowances offices (HAOs) who administer the programme. Field work included on-site reviews at 17 HAOs and analysis of about 1200 files of programme beneficiaries. For administrative practices covering such areas as the presence of written job descriptions, written guidelines for intake workers, generation of reports for higher-level authorities and setting standards for the routine review of files of applicants determined to be eligible for benefits, applicants rejected and time during which processing of approved cases should be completed, HAOs had a fair record. Generally, 2-4 of the studied offices failed the standards set out in the paper. However, frequent instances of incomplete record-keeping about HAO operations limit our conclusions and highlight an area definitely needing improvement. On the other hand, and important for programme credibility, errors in computing subsidies paid to beneficiaries were found to be universally very low. Overall, HAO performance is adequate but highly variable and improvements are clearly needed. The results can be interpreted as being consistent with HAO staff acceptance of housing allowances as a legitimate replacement for the previous broad entitlement to benefits that worked through controlled rents in state housing. The adequate operation of HAOs should work to strengthen popular support of broader economic and political reforms.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Urban Studies,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3