An analytical framework for postmortems of European foreign policy: should decision-makers have been surprised?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An analytical framework for postmortems of European foreign policy: should decision-makers have been surprised?

Published:2020-01-01 Issue:2 Volume:35 Page:197-215
ISSN:0268-4527
Container-title:Intelligence and National Security
language:en
Short-container-title:Intelligence and National Security

Author:

Ikani Nikki^ORCID,Guttmann Aviva^ORCID,Meyer Christoph O.^ORCID

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,History

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02684527.2019.1704384

Reference59 articles.

1. Russian ‘deniable’ intervention in Ukraine: how and why Russia broke the rules

2. Auswärtiges Amt. “Grundprinzipien Deutscher Außenpolitik.” https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/de/aussenpolitik/themen/grundprinzipien-deutscher-aussenpolitik/216474

3. The Arab Spring and its Surprises

4. Analysis, War, and Decision: Why Intelligence Failures Are Inevitable

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Caught off guard? Evaluating how external experts in Germany warned about Russia’s war on Ukraine;Intelligence and National Security;2024-04-04

2. The underlying causes of strategic surprise in EU foreign policy: a post-mortem investigation of the Arab uprisings and the Ukraine–Russia crisis of 2013/14;European Security;2022-11-11

3. The Rise of ISIS as a Partial Surprise: An Open-Source Analysis on the Threat Evolution and Early Warnings in the United Kingdom;International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence;2022-08-10

4. How surprising was ISIS’ rise to power for the German intelligence community? Reconstructing estimates of likelihood prior to the fall of Mosul;Intelligence and National Security;2021-10-18

5. The EU’s Response to the Ukraine Crisis;The Palgrave Handbook of EU Crises;2020-12-22