The truth and nothing but the truth: court-appointed forensic experts’ experience with testifying and their perceptions of legal actors in criminal courts-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The truth and nothing but the truth: court-appointed forensic experts’ experience with testifying and their perceptions of legal actors in criminal courts

Published:2013-04 Issue:2 Volume:24 Page:192-204
ISSN:1478-9949
Container-title:The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology

Author:

Grøndahl Pål,Stridbeck Ulf,Grønnerød Cato

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Link

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14789949.2013.771278

Reference23 articles.

1. Crown prosecutors' views of psychiatric evidence in New Zealand

2. Sexual Assault Nurse Examinersʼ Experiences Providing Expert Witness Court Testimony

3. Expert testimony and pseudoscience: How mental health professionals are taking over the courtroom

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Two Roads Converge: The Interchange Between the Mental Health and Legal Discourses in Sexual Assault Trials;Social & Legal Studies;2022-08-05

2. Two Roads Converge: The Interchange between the Mental Health and Legal Discourses in Sexual Assault Trials;SSRN Electronic Journal;2022

3. Testing the waters: An investigation of the impact of hot tubbing on experts from referral through testimony.;Law and Human Behavior;2021-06

4. The use of test instruments in forensic report writing – Explorative research in Flanders;International Journal of Law and Psychiatry;2019-09

5. Expert for Whom? Court-Appointed Versus Party-Appointed Experts;Psychiatry, Psychology and Law;2015-08-27