Global Warming and the Interaction Between the Public and Technical Spheres of Argument: When Standards for Expertise Really Matter-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Global Warming and the Interaction Between the Public and Technical Spheres of Argument: When Standards for Expertise Really Matter

Published:2012-03 Issue:4 Volume:48 Page:231-242
ISSN:1051-1431
Container-title:Argumentation and Advocacy
language:en
Short-container-title:Argumentation and Advocacy

Author:

Paliewicz Nicholas S.¹

Affiliation:

1. Nicholas S. Paliewicz, Ph.D. Student, Department of Communication, University of Utah . The author would like to thank Edward Hinck and Jeffrey Drury for their guidance and support with this project.

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Communication

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00028533.2012.11821774

Reference79 articles.

1. Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change

2. Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance

3. When Poststructural Theory and Contemporary Politics Collide—The Vexed Case of Global Warming

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Judging Technical Claims in Democratic Deliberation: A Rhetorical Analysis of Two Citizens’ Initiative Review Panels in Oregon;Western Journal of Communication;2021-08-08

2. Post-dialectics and fascistic argumentation in the global climate change debate;Argumentation and Advocacy;2020-07-02

3. Engaging publics through climate math;Journal of Argumentation in Context;2018-12-31

4. When good arguments do not work: post-dialectics, argument assemblages, and the networks of climate skepticism;Argumentation and Advocacy;2017-09-20

5. The Supreme Court cleans the air: legal and scientific standards for argument in Massachusetts v. EPA;Argumentation and Advocacy;2017-01-02