Generic Versus Specialist Clinical Work Roles of Occupational Therapists and Social Workers in Mental Health

Author:

Lloyd Chris1,King Robert2,Mckenna Kryss1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia

2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Abstract

Objective: There has been limited research in Australia examining the extent of generic and specialist work activities carried out by occupational therapists and social workers since the introduction of mental health reform. The aim of the project was to: (i) identify specific clinical work activities of occupational therapists and social workers; and (ii) identify whether they are performing a greater proportion of generic than specialist clinical or discipline specific core skills. Method: A cross-sectional survey of 304 (response rate 76.6%) occupational therapists and social workers working in mental health was conducted. For the purposes of the study a new instrument was developed to cover broad categories of clinical work activities. Results: The majority of the respondents were female, under the age of 30 years, who had worked in their current position less than 5 years. Generic work activities were the primary activities of the two professional groups, with nine of the 10 activities undertaken most frequently being generic in nature. Social work respondents performed more work activities while occupational therapists undertook more specialist clinical activities. Conclusions: Occupational therapists and social workers are required to have common competencies in addition to discipline-specific competencies in order to undertake broadspectrum mental health service activities. This has implications for the skill mix, education and training and recruitment of staff.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3