Barriers to the Effective Management of Depression in General Practice

Author:

Richards Jeffrey C.1,Richards Jeffrey C.1,Ryan Paul1,Mccabe Marita P.2,Groom Grace3,Hickie Ian B.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

2. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

3. Mental Health Council of Australia, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

4. Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of prior general practice training in mental health and practice location on general practitioner (GP) attitudes toward depression, self-confidence in assessing and treating depressed patients, identification of doctor, patient and practice barriers to the effective care of depressed patients in general medical practice and GP-reported current clinical practice. Method: Fifty-two (out of 123) Divisions of General Practice that responded to an invitation to participate in the study distributed 608 anonymous surveys to a representative sample of GPs; 420 (69%) were returned. The questionnaire focused on current clinical practice, perceived barriers to care of depressed patients and doctors' self-efficacy for assessing and treating depressed patients. It also consisted of two scales, based upon previous research, designed to assess doctors' attitudes towards depression and depressed patients. Results: General practitioners who had undertaken mental health education and training more often used non-pharmacological treatments (p = 0.00), as did female GPs (p = 0.00). Male GPs (p = 0.00) and those in rural settings (p = 0.01) more often prescribed medication for depression. Those without mental health training more often identified incomplete knowledge about depression as a barrier to its effective management (p = 0.00). Urban-based GPs (p = 0.04) and those with prior mental health training (p = 0.00) were more confident in the use of non-pharmacological treatments. Female GPs without mental health training were the least confident in the use of these methods (p = 0.01). Overall, GPs with mental health training were more positive in their attitudes toward depression and their treatment of these patients (p = 0.00). Female GPs appeared more positive in their attitudes toward depression than male GPs (p = 0.01), although the results were not entirely consistent. Conclusions: Participation in mental health training by GPs appears to be related to their attitudes toward depressed patients and to their confidence and abilities to diagnose and manage the common mental disorders effectively.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3