Psychotherapy in the Medically Ill: A Commentary

Abstract

Objective: To overview the field of psychotherapy in the medically ill. Rather than attempting a systematic review of this very extensive area, the article seeks to capture some of the main threads and issues of importance. Method: The subject is looked at under four headings: (i) which illnesses have attracted research interest in psychotherapy; (ii) which outcome measures have been chosen; (iii) which modes of intervention have been used; and (iv) finally a review of the methodology and the results obtained. Results: Some illnesses have attracted much more psychotherapeutic interest than others; the differences are haphazard. Outcome measures on the whole have focused on coping with illness and psychological distress, with a smaller number looking at disease outcome. Only short-term changes have been sought in the main. The most commonly used modalities of therapy have been cognitive-behavioural; additionally, supportive information-giving and group therapy have been trialled. Benefit in terms of all these have been reported, but the majority of studies are weakened by major methodological shortcomings. Conclusion: There is an overall paucity of well-designed studies that clearly demonstrate psychotherapy as an efficacious treatment in the medically ill. The field is hampered by the lack of a clear conceptual thread recognizing the long-term and diverse experience of patients with medical illness and relating this to the question of the part psychotherapy should play. Future work needs to concentrate on appropriate selection of patients who might benefit, as well as including a wider range of more clinically relevant outcome measures and more stringent methodology.