Abstract
SummaryThe creation of both a Ministry and a Department for equal opportunities has been Italy's main institutional response to EU pressures in the field of equal opportunities policy. Nevertheless, the impact of Italian negotiators in the EU depends not only on the institutional resources available to them, but also on the political credibility acquired by presenting well-defined and clear preferences during the bargaining process in the Council. This article considers how the Italian position was presented, and how successful it was, in two recently approved Directives, one decided by qualified majority vote, the other on a basis of unanimity. The aim of the analysis is to assess Italy's capacity to influence EU social affairs. Information was gathered by conducting qualitative interviews with the main political actors involved in the decision-making process at the national and European levels.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History,Anthropology,Cultural Studies
Reference49 articles.
1. See Pierson Paul and Leibfried Stephan (eds), European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration , The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 1995; Hervey Tamara K. and O'Keefe David (eds), Sex Equality Law in the European Union, Wiley, New York, 1996; Hoskyns Catherine , ‘A Study of Four Action Programmes on Equal Opportunities’, in Rossilli Mariagrazia (ed.), Gender Policies in the European Union, Peter Lang, New York, 2000, pp. 43–59. Equal opportunities is one of the pillars of the European Employment Strategy. See Rubery Jill , ‘Gender Mainstreaming and Gender Equality on the EU: The Impact of the EU Employment Strategy’, Industrial Relations Journal, 33, 5, 2002, pp. 500–22.
2. COM (1999) 565 final.
3. Statement released on 7 May 2002. See: European Industrial Relations Observatory on-line at http://www.eiro.eurofound.eu.int/index.html.
4. A5-0173/2001 final, 16 May 2001.
5. COM/2001/321/final.