1. For instance PriceThinking and Experience1953 23 26 and G. Küng:Ontology and the Logistic Analysis of Language(1963) p. 168.
2. InPhilosophical Arguments1961 19 25 John Passmore, following John Anderson, produces a slightly different version of this argument. He takes the relational property ofparticipating in Fwhichaand other particulars must be supposed to have, and then argues that, in consistency, we must give an account of this asa's participating inparticipation in F, and so on indefinitely. He also notes that the same style of argument can be turned against other relational solutions of the problem of universals (p. 23). I find this version a little less clear, because it may be questioned whetherparticipation in Fis a genuine universal.