Appointment of constitutional adjudicators in Africa: some perspectives on how different systems yield similar outcomes-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Appointment of constitutional adjudicators in Africa: some perspectives on how different systems yield similar outcomes

Published:2014-05-04 Issue:2 Volume:46 Page:249-275
ISSN:0732-9113
Container-title:The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law
language:en
Short-container-title:The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law

Author:

Fombad Charles Manga

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Law

Link

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07329113.2014.932961

Reference35 articles.

1. Counting parties and identifying dominant party systems in Africa

2. Brooks, H. 2004. “Realising Effective and Sustainable Democratic Governance in Southern Africa and Beyond.”EISA Occasional Paper No. 25. 1–24. Auckland park, South Africa: EISA.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Examining the mediating role of Ghana’s customary institutions in resolving the 2012 electoral conflict;African Identities;2022-11-14

2. Adjudicating electoral disputes or judicialising politics? The Supreme Court of Ghana and the disputed 2012 presidential election in perspective;The Round Table;2021-11-02

3. The politics of judicial review of elections in Ghana: Implications for judicial reforms and emerging electoral jurisprudence;Africa Review;2021-06-19

4. A comparative overview of recent trends in judicial appointments: selected cases from Africa;Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines;2020-09-08

5. Sustaining and jeopardising a credible arbiter: Judicial networks in Benin’s consolidating democracy;International Political Science Review;2018-11