Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: Comparison between a Gd-BOPTA- and a Gd-DTPA-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequence and a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession sequence

Author:

Nassenstein K.1,Breuckmann F.2,Hunold P.1,Barkhausen J.1,Schlosser T.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

2. Clinic of Cardiology, West German Heart Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

Abstract

Background: Several studies have demonstrated that the administration of contrast agents is advantageous in magnetic resonance coronary angiography (MRCA). Purpose: To compare a non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free-precession (SSFP) with a contrast-enhanced inversion recovery spoiled gradient-echo (IR-GE) sequence using two different contrast agents for MRCA. Material and Methods: Eight healthy volunteers were examined on a 1.5T MR scanner. For non-contrast-enhanced MRCA, a breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) SSFP sequence (repetition/echo time [TR/TE] 3.9/1.7 ms, flip angle [FA] 65°) was used. Contrast-enhanced MRCA was performed repetitively in two imaging sessions over 30 min after injection of 0.2 mmol/kg body weight gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) or gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) using a breath-hold 3D IR-GE sequence (TR/TE 4.1/1.7 ms, FA 15°). The signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of the coronary arteries, as well as the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) between coronary arteries and perivascular tissue, were calculated for all images. Blood T1 values were repetitively estimated over 30 min using an SSFP sequence with incrementally increasing inversion times (TR/TE 2.4/1.0 ms, FA 50°). Results: Gd-BOPTA-enhanced images showed significantly ( P<0.05) higher SNR and CNR compared to Gd-DTPA-enhanced images for all times after contrast injection (SNR: 1 min post injection [PI] 26.4±4.2 vs. 16.2±3.1; CNR: 1 min PI 21.4±3.7 vs. 13.2±2.6). Compared to the SSFP images, the Gd-BOPTA-enhanced images showed higher CNR values for all times after injection (1 min PI 21.4±3.7 vs. 13.8±5.5; P<0.05), whereas the Gd-DTPA-enhanced images did not (1 min PI 13.2±2.6 vs. 13.8±5.5; P>0.05). Blood T1 estimates were not significantly different for either agent 1 min after administration ( P>0.05), but they were significantly lower for Gd-BOPTA ( P<0.05) from 7 to 25 min after injection. Conclusion: Compared to non-contrast-enhanced SSFP images, only Gd-BOPTA-enhanced images show a significantly improved contrast between the coronary arteries and the surrounding tissue.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Cardiac MR Angiography;Protocols and Methodologies in Basic Science and Clinical Cardiac MRI;2017-10-25

2. DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY OF Gd-TTDA-BOM COMPARED WITH Gd-DTPA IN NORMAL RAT AT 3T;Biomedical Engineering: Applications, Basis and Communications;2014-03-12

3. Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography: Where Are We Today?;Current Cardiology Reports;2013-01-11

4. MR-imaging of the thoracic aorta: 3D-ECG- and respiratory-gated bSSFP imaging using the CLAWS algorithm versus contrast-enhanced 3D-MRA;European Journal of Radiology;2012-02

5. Coronary Imaging With Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Current State of the Art;Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases;2011-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3