Affiliation:
1. Erciyes University Medical Faculty, Department of Radiology, Kayseri, Turkey
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the inter-method agreement between intraoperative ultrasonography and postoperative contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting tumor residue. Material and Methods: After resection was completed, the cavity borders of 32 tumors were examined with a 7 MHz intraoperative probe. Any echogenic region>5 mm in thickness extending from the surgical cavity into the brain substance was taken as the sonographic criterion for residual tumor. A continuous echogenic rim<5 mm was considered normal. Results were correlated with gadolinium-enhanced MRI obtained within 48 h after surgery. Results: The kappa value for inter-method agreement was 0.72. There were four cases in whom MRI showed residue despite a negative sonography: extensive edema or Surgicel along the cavity borders (three cases with glioblastoma multiforme) and the cystic component in the vicinity of cerebrospinal fluid (a case with pituitary macroadenoma) may be the reason for the residue going undetected. In a case with glioblastoma multiforme, residual enhancement was<5 mm in thickness. Conclusion: Intraoperative ultrasound is an effective tool for maximizing the extent of intracranial tumor resection. Surgical use has to be minimized if intraoperative ultrasound is to be used as an adjunct to surgery. Tumors with preoperatively detected cystic components in the proximity of CSF-containing spaces have to be carefully evaluated with intraoperative ultrasound if residual cystic components are to be detected. A low-thickness echogenic rim should not be considered a reliable sign of the absence of residue.
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Reference19 articles.
1. Albert, F. K. and Forsting, M. and Sartor, K. and Adams, H. P. and Kunze, S. (1994) Early postoperative magnetic resonance imaging after resection of malignant glioma: objective evaluation of residual tumor and its influence on regrowth and prognosis. Neurosurgery, 4, pp. 45 - 60.
2. Auer, L. M. and van Velthoven, V. (1990) Intraoperative ultrasound (US) imaging. Comparison of pathomorphological findings in US and CT. Acta Neurochir, 104, pp. 84 - 95.
3. Becker, G. and Hofmann, E. and Woydt, M. and Hulsmann, U. and Maurer, M. and Lindner, A. and (1999) Postoperative neuroimaging of high‐grade gliomas: comparison of transcranial sonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography. Neurosurgery, 44, pp. 469 - 77.
4. Cairncross, J. G. and Pexman, J. H. and Rathbone, M. P. and DelMaestro, R. F. (1985) Postoperative contrast enhancement in patients with brain tumor. Ann Neurol, 17, pp. 570 - 2.
5. Hammoud, M. A. and Ligon, B. L. and Elsouki, R. and Shi, W. M. and Schomer, D. F. and Sawaya, R. (1996) Use of intraoperative ultrasound for localizing tumors and determining the extent of resection: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg, 84, pp. 737 - 41.
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献