Assessing Measurement Invariance in ASWB Exams: Regulatory Research Proposal to Advance Equity-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessing Measurement Invariance in ASWB Exams: Regulatory Research Proposal to Advance Equity

Published:2024-02-12 Issue:2 Volume:21 Page:214-235
ISSN:2640-8066
Container-title:Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work

Author:

DeCarlo Matthew¹^ORCID,Bean Gerald²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Education and Human Development, Saint Joseph’s University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

2. College of Social Work, College of Education & Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Funder

The author(s) reported that there is no funding associated with the work

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/26408066.2024.2308814

Reference66 articles.

1. A Test of the Validity of the LCSW Examination: Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?

2. American Psychological Association, the American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014) . Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

3. Association of Social Work Boards. (2021). Manual for New Board Members. https://www.aswb.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Your-Association-2021.pdf

4. Association of Social Work Boards. (2022b June). ASWB Exam Candidate Handbook. https://www.aswb.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Candidate-handbook-06-2021.pdf

5. Association of Social Work Boards. (2023c). DIF V. DTF. https://www.aswb.org/exam/measuring-social-work-competence/measuring-competence-fairly/dif-vs-dtf/

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Social Work Interstate Compact Legislation: Points for Analysis and Advocacy;Social Work;2024-05-06