A comparative study of two design charrettes: implications for codesign and participatory action research-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A comparative study of two design charrettes: implications for codesign and participatory action research

Published:2014-01-02 Issue:1 Volume:10 Page:46-62
ISSN:1571-0882
Container-title:CoDesign
language:en
Short-container-title:CoDesign

Author:

Howard Zaana,Somerville Mary M.

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Architecture

Link

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15710882.2014.881883

Reference33 articles.

1. Participatory Action Research and Action Science Compared

2. Beckley, T., J.Parkins, and S.Sheppard. 2005. Public Participation in Sustainable Forest Management: A Reference Guide. Edmonton: Sustainable Forest Management Network.

3. Library Spaces for Urban, Diverse Commuter Students: A Participatory Action Research Project

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Youth Participatory Action Research for Equitable Urban Design;Journal of Participatory Research Methods;2024-07-29

2. Designing for Communities with Communities: A Public Library Codesign Project;Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association;2024-04-02

3. A Culturally Humble Approach to Designing a Sports-Based Youth Development Program With African-Australian Community;Qualitative Health Research;2024-03-14

4. Applying the third-place concept for transitional spaces in the Korean university using the design charrette approach;Open House International;2024-02-23

5. Analysis of FM involvement during project Lifecycle phases;Journal of Facilities Management;2023-10-09