Statistical Fallacies in Claims about “Massive and Widespread Fraud” in the 2020 Presidential Election: Examining Claims Based on Aggregate Election Results-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Statistical Fallacies in Claims about “Massive and Widespread Fraud” in the 2020 Presidential Election: Examining Claims Based on Aggregate Election Results

Published:2024-01-05 Issue:1 Volume:11 Page:
ISSN:2330-443X
Container-title:Statistics and Public Policy
language:en
Short-container-title:Statistics and Public Policy

Author:

Grofman Bernard¹^ORCID,Cervas Jonathan²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA

2. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Public Administration,Statistics and Probability

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/2330443X.2023.2289529

Reference98 articles.

1. Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties But Behave Like Rabid Partisans

2. Alba D. and Frenkel S. (2021) “Watch Out for This Misinformation When Congress Meets to Certify the Election.” The New York Times . Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/06/business/election-fraud.html (Accessed November 25 2023).

3. Ayyadurai S. (2020) “Dr.SHIVA LIVE: MIT PhD Analysis of Michigan Votes Reveals Unfortunate Truth of U.S. Voting Systems ” November 10. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk

4. Bentham, J. (2002), “Rights, Representation, and Reform: Nonsense upon Stilts and Other Writings on the French Revolution,” in The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham (1st ed.), eds. P. Schofield, C. Pease-Watkin, and C. Blamires, pp. 317–401, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

5. The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Liars know they are lying: differentiating disinformation from disagreement;Humanities and Social Sciences Communications;2024-07-31