An historical review of the Harvard and the National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires: Their similarities, differences, and their limitations in assessment of food intake-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An historical review of the Harvard and the National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires: Their similarities, differences, and their limitations in assessment of food intake

Published:2002-01 Issue:1 Volume:41 Page:35-74
ISSN:0367-0244
Container-title:Ecology of Food and Nutrition
language:en
Short-container-title:Ecology of Food and Nutrition

Author:

Stark Azadeh

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Ecology,General Medicine,Food Science,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Link

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03670240212531

Reference97 articles.

1. THE ATHEROSCLEROSIS RISK IN COMMUNIT (ARIC) STUDY: DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES

2. Armstrong, B.K., White, E. and Saracci, R. 1992.Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology, 49–75. New York: Oxford University Press. Chapter 3

3. THE EFFECTS OF MEASUREMENT ERRORS ON RELATWE RISK REGRESSIONS

4. Verbal report methods in clinical research on alcoholism: response bias and its minimization.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Development of dish-based population-specific food frequency questionnaire for dietary assessments in Afghanistan;F1000Research;2023-06-16

2. Nutrition Patterns of Polish Esports Players;Nutrients;2022-12-28

3. Development of the Thai semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (semi-FFQ) for people at risk for metabolic syndrome;Journal of Public Health;2021-01-07

4. Validation of a Dish-Based Semiquantitative Food Questionnaire in Rural Bangladesh;Nutrients;2017-01-10

5. Development of a FFQ for breast cancer survivors in Korea;British Journal of Nutrition;2016-11-15