Affiliation:
1. Lecturer in Law, School of Law, University of Limerick
Abstract
In the past decade there have been a number of judicial review cases involving sports governing bodies in Ireland. While the courts have been willing to hear such cases, it has been repeatedly emphasised that judicial intervention in the decisions of sporting organisations should not occur lightly and recourse to the courts should only happen in the most exceptional of circumstances. The Irish courts have referred to the need for sports bodies to submit their dispute to arbitration or mediation. In Ireland there are two domestic bodies offering alternative dispute resolution in the sporting context: Just Sport Ireland (JSI) and the Disputes Resolution Authority (DRA) of the Gaelic Athletic Association (GAA). The availability of alternative forms of dispute resolution in Ireland provides a welcome alternative to the expensive, often divisive, option of judicial review proceedings. Given the benefits of resolution of disputes through the DRA or JSI and in light of the Irish courts’ general reluctance to become involved in sporting disputes, it is likely that these processes will become increasingly availed of, most pertinently as Sport Ireland (formerly Irish Sports Council (ISC)) has made it a condition for recognition for new governing bodies and has been actively encouraging existing sports governing bodies to insert a referral clause in their rules.
Publisher
University of Westminster Press
Reference27 articles.
1. An Accident of History: Why the Decisions of Sports Governing Bodies are not Amenable to Judicial Review;Anderson
J;Common Law World Review,2006
2. Keeping sports out of the courts: the use of alternative dispute resolution in Irish sport;Anderson
J;Arbitration,2010a
3. Modern Sports Law
4. Why Aga Khan is Wrong;Beloff
M
Kerr
T;Judicial Review,1996
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献