Just Advisory and Maximally Representative: A Conjoint Experiment on Non-Participants' Legitimacy Perceptions of Deliberative Forums-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Just Advisory and Maximally Representative: A Conjoint Experiment on Non-Participants' Legitimacy Perceptions of Deliberative Forums

Published:2021-04-23 Issue:1 Volume:17 Page:
ISSN:2634-0488
Container-title:Regular Issue
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Goldberg Saskia

Publisher

University of Westminster Press

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference52 articles.

1. Abramson, S. F., Kocak, K., & Magazinnik, A. (2020, February 3). What do we learn about voter preferences from conjoint experiments? Retrieved from osf.io/qb4pf

2. Towards a more robust, but limited and contingent defense of the political uses of deliberative minipublics;Bächtiger, A.Goldberg, S.;Journal of Deliberative Democracy,2020

3. Democracy and lottery: Revisited;Buchstein, H.;Constellations,2019

4. The Legitimacy of Citizen-led Deliberative Democracy

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Fair Enough? Mini-Public Composition and Outcome Acceptance from the Maxi Public;Journal of Deliberative Democracy;2024-08-29

2. Support for Deliberative mini-Publics among the Losers of Representative Democracy;British Journal of Political Science;2023-12-04

3. Dialogorientierte Beteiligung: Individuelle Bestimmungsgründe für die Teilnahme und Bewertung;Politik gestalten - Kommunikation, Deliberation und Partizipation bei politisch relevanten Projekten;2023

4. Dialogischer Bürgerinnen- und Bürgerbeteiligung in Baden-Württemberg. Eine Einleitung;Politik gestalten - Kommunikation, Deliberation und Partizipation bei politisch relevanten Projekten;2023

5. Picturing deliberation: How dissatisfied citizens make sense of it;International Political Science Review;2022-12-07