Abstract
Urinary stone disease has afflicted humankind since antiquity[1]. It remains a common urological condition worldwide, including in our environment[2]. Although open surgery was previously the main option for stone removal, advances in technology mean that treatment is now largely through minimally invasive surgery, as recommended by a number of urological guidelines[3,4]. Unfortunately, at our centre, we still treat urinary stones solely through open surgery, mostly because we lack endoscopic equipment. In addition, most of our patients, even if referred to facilities where endoscopic management is possible, cannot afford the cost of treatment.
Publisher
Societe Internationale dUrologie
Reference6 articles.
1. 1. Tefekli A, Cezayirli F. The history of urinary stones: in parallel with civilization. Scientific World Journal.2013;. doi.org/10.1155/2013/423964
2. 2. Çakici ÖU, Ener K, Keske M, Altinova S, Canda AE, Aldemir M, et al. Open stone surgery: a still-in-use approach for complex stone burden. Cent European J Urol.2017;70(2):179–184.
3. 3. Tzelves L, Türk C, Skolarikos A. European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines: Where Are We Going? Eur Urol Focus.2020:S2405–4569(20)30270-30274.
4. 4. Zumstein V, Betschart P, Abt D, Schmid HP, Panje CM, Putora PM. Surgical management of urolithiasis - a systematic analysis of available guidelines. BMC Urol.2018 Apr 10;18(1):25.
5. 5. Buchholz N, Elhowairis ME, Bach C, Moraitis K, Masood J. From 'stone cutting' to high-technology methods: The changing face of stone surgery. Arab J Urol.2011 Mar;9(1):25–27.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Striving for Global Representation;Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal;2021-03-15