Regulatory obstacles to distance learning technology for the promotion of equality in higher education

Author:

Cabral Rodrigo MacielORCID,Freitas Daniel Castanha de

Abstract

The 4th Industrial Revolution led the world to experience technological transformations in a significantly fast pace. As a result of this movement, the Fundamental Right to Education has also undergone modifications: with the emergence of pieces of software for managing educational institutions and school activities and an increasing possibility of access to didactic contents, the proposal to replace the traditional learning model by distance learning has also emerged. However, regulations about the subject in the Brazilian legal system are sparse and inconsistent. Because of that, there is a massification of education due the economic interest of private institutions that choose to invest in this new type of education, also considering that they will benefit from lowering costs. The expansion of distance learning comes up against the lack of universalization of the technology itself, considering that the inequality of positions is evident when it comes to the access to technologies that are required for attending distance learning. Although the objective of distance learning is the universalization of education, the mismatch between regulation agent and technological innovations allows for verifying the non-fulfillment of the purpose, jeopardizing the fundamental right to education with quality, regardless of the economic exploration of the public service.

Publisher

International Journal of Digital Law

Subject

Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference60 articles.

1. ALVES, Lucineia. Educação à distância: conceitos e história no Brasil e no mundo. Revista Brasileira de Aprendizagem Aberta e a Distância, São Paulo, v. 10, p. 83-92, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17143/rbaad.v10i0.235.

2. BACICH, Lilian; TANZI NETO, Adolfo; TREVISANI, Fernando de Mello (Org.). Ensino híbrido: personalização e tecnologia na educação. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2015. e-PUB Kindle.

3. BAPTISTA, Patrícia; KELLER, Clara Iglesias. Por que, quando e como regular as novas tecnologias? Os desafios trazidos pelas inovações disruptivas. Revista de Direito Administrativo, Rio de Janeiro, v. 273, p. 123-163, sep./dec. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12660/rda.v273.2016.66659.

4. BERMÚDEZ, Ana Carla. Sob Bolsonaro, MEC tem maior número de trocas desde a redemocratização. Available on: . Access on: Aug. 2nd, 2020.

5. BORGES, Dani. Ensino à distância na quarentena esbarra na realidade de alunos e professores da rede pública. Available on: . Access on: Aug. 4th, 2020.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3