The urgency of regulating and promoting artificial intelligence in the light of the precautionary principle and sustainable development

Author:

Schier Adriana da Costa Ricardo,Maksym Cristina Borges Ribas,Mota Vitória DionísioORCID

Abstract

The objective of this research is to analyze whether the Brazilian state has had any initiatives to regulate artificial intelligence in a way that promotes sustainable development. It is based on the need for this regulation in light of the precautionary in order to avoid irreversible damage, as in the case of the use of artificial intelligence in robotic cars or in health care, in the replacement of administrative or judicial decisions that involve value analysis by automated and exegetical decisions, as well as because of the democratic damages resulting from interference in elections. Moreover, considering that what most suffocates innovations is not their regulation, but rather, the absence of a coordinated and vigorous national state entrepreneurship, it is also verified whether there are no initiatives in the country to promote the use of artificial intelligence in the market or by the government. The methodology used is a bibliographic review and comparison of the regulatory and development initiatives established in other countries. The central hypothesis is that despite sparse initiatives, artificial intelligence has not been a priority in the Brazilian State, whether seen as a regulatory State or as an entrepreneurial State.

Publisher

International Journal of Digital Law

Subject

Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference25 articles.

1. ANTUNES, Paulo de Bessa. Direito Ambiental. 11ª Ed. rev. atual e ampl. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2008, p. 29-45.

2. BAPTISTA, Patrícia; KELLER, Clara Iglesias. Por que, quando e como regular as novas tecnologias?Os desafios trazidos pelasinovações disruptivas. RDA – revista de Direito Administrativo, Rio de Janeiro, v. 273, p. 123-163, set./dez. 2016.

3. Charte éthique européenne d’utilisation de “l’intelligence artificielle dans les systèmes judiciaires et leur environnementadoptée par la CEPEJ lors de sa 31ème réunion plénière, Strasbourg, 3-4 décembre 2018, p. 36-45.

4. CORVALÁN, Juan Gustavo. Inteligencia artificial: retos, desafíos y oportunidades – Prometea: la primera inteligencia artificial de Latinoamérica al servicio de la Justicia. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, Curitiba, vol. 5, n. 1, p. 295-316, jan./abr. 2018.

5. DIONISIO, Pedrode Hollanda. Princípio da precaução e contradições na regulação do risco: uma análise comparada entre Estados Unidos e Europa. Regulação 4.0 (livro eletrônico): novas tecnologias sob a perspectiva regulatória.BECKER, Daniel. FERRARI, Isabela. São Paulo: Thompsons Reuters Brasil, 2019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3