Securitization of Migration and Crisis Management in Poland

Author:

Liszkowska Dominika1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Koszalin University of Technology, Poland

Abstract

ObjectivesThe purpose of article is to present the issue of migration crisis management in the context of securitization theory. It is of key importance to show the way in which the phenomenon of migration and crises are presented to the Polish public by political actors, as well as the actions taken to solve them. The analysis covers two important migration crises in the recent years, namely the EU refugee crisis that was particularly intensified in 2015 and the crisis on the Belarusian border in 2021-2022.MethodsThe approach used in the research process is descriptive and exploratory in its nature. The main methods used in this study include desk research and a systematic review of literature and of websites concerning securitization theory and migration crises selected as case studies.ResultsWhat is also associated with the policies and practices in place at the time of migration crises, is a negative migration discourse, compounded by a narrative that describes migration and migrants as a threat, and images designed to create fear. Socially constructed “threats of migration” as a security issue in Poland concern migrants from the Middle East and Africa.ConclusionsIn a situation referred to as a crisis, during which migrants are defined as a threat requiring the use of emergency measures, policymakers have an option of managing migration to limit its scale. This model involves, among other things, closing borders, increasing the number of services, denying asylum requests or, finally, erecting a fence and a monitoring system in the cross-border area.

Publisher

Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna w Warszawie

Reference29 articles.

1. Bałamut, A. (2018). Polska wobec kryzysu imigracyjnego w Unii Europejskiej [in:] Molo. B. (Ed.), Migracja i uchodźstwo wyzwaniem dla bezpieczeństwa i współpracy międzynarodowej w XXI wieku. Kraków: Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego, pp. 103-120.

2. Białas, J., Górczyńska, M., Witko, D. (2019). Dostęp do procedury azylowej na zewnętrznych granicach Polski. Stan obecny i wyzwania na przyszłość. Available at: https://hfhr.pl/upload/2022/01/-doste-p-do-procedury-azylowej-na-zewne-trznych-granicach-polski_-stan-obecny-i-wyzwania-na-przyszlos-c-.pdf.

3. Bielecka-Prus, J. (2020). Obraz imigrantek z Ukrainy w polskim dyskursie prasowym. Migration Studies– Review of Polish Diaspora, 176 (2), pp. 177-200.

4. Buzan, B., Waever, O., Wilde de J. (1998). Security a New Framework for Analysis. Boulder–London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

5. Cabaj, M. (2014). Zarządzanie kryzysowe – integralna część bezpieczeństwa narodowego. Studia z zakresu prawa, administracji i zarządzania UKW, 6, pp. 101-113.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3