Abstract
Public debates and discussions concerning physician-assisted suicide have recently arisen in South Korea in response to proposals made in the National Assembly for new legislation governing this and other aspects of end-of-life medical care. Two contrasting positions can be discerned in these debates: one position views physician-assisted suicide as respecting patients’ autonomy and guaranteeing their right to a “death with dignity”; the other argues that physician-assisted suicide might be transformed into a “duty to die,” especially since dying care has not yet been well established in Korea. On this latter view, the expansion of hospice for end-of-life care should precede the introduction of physician-assisted suicide. The present article examines these two views in detail and explores the state of end-of-life medical care in Korea.
Publisher
The Korean Society for Medical Ethics
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference3 articles.
1. Twelve members, including Rep. Ahn GB. Amendent bill on ‘Act On Hospice And Palliative Care And Decisions On Life-sustaining Treatment For Patients At The End Of Life’ (proposed by bill No. 2115986, 2022.6.15.)
2. Ahn KJ, Park KS. Perceptions and Experiences of the Death of the Elderly: Suffering of Death and Meaning of Life. Human Beings, Environment and their Future 2021;26:63-97.
3. Park KS, Suh YJ, Ahn KJ. Dilemma in Decision Making about Life-Sustaining Treatment and its Social Context. Society and Theory 2015;26(1);255-302. 10.17209/st.2015.05.26.255